Resources.
Public resources for understanding Xolver products, application paths, review workflows, and operating concepts.
Not every implementation detail belongs on a public marketing site. Deeper materials are shared with qualified partners during an engagement.
This page is the public resource entry point. It keeps the buyer journey simple and points partners to deeper materials where appropriate.
Find your starting point
Start from the role you play in the buying or deployment process. Xolver moves from preview to pilot only after the site, task, and safety requirements are understood.
OEMs
Start with: Fit assessment for your machine family and customer needs.
Share: Machine type, current controls, target tasks, and the customer experience you want to offer.
Next: Confirm fit and share the right partner materials.
System integrators
Start with: Commissioning review for an existing cell.
Share: Cell layout, robot type, fixtures, task goals, and known safety requirements.
Next: Draft a path from preview to pilot review.
Enterprise operators
Start with: Use-case scoping, cell constraints, and passive evaluation pilot planning.
Share: Operational problem, current downtime/reprogramming cost, and pilot success criteria.
Next: Decide whether a bounded technical assessment or pilot makes sense.
Technical evaluators
Start with: Product, readiness, and deployment materials.
Share: Evaluation questions, operating assumptions, and what proof your team needs.
Next: Review preview flows before discussing a live pilot.
Tactile & Dexterous End-Effectors
Xolver supports contact-rich robotic workflows where grip, touch, and changing part state matter. Public materials explain the application questions; partner materials cover implementation detail.
Use this when
- Your workflow depends on grip quality or contact state
- You are evaluating contact-rich handling workflows
- You need review records for contact-rich manipulation
- You want handling context visible during operator review
Deliverables
Use-case assessment, equipment review, operating records, commissioning notes, and partner-specific materials.
Runtime Overview
Public overview for how Xolver connects preview, review, operating context, and records.
Research Notes
Retrofit Documentation
Tactile & Dexterous End-Effectors
Understand how contact-rich robot work can be reviewed, monitored, and improved.
Console Application Studio
Prepare workflows, review proposed behavior, inspect incidents, and manage recovery paths.
Xolver Sentinel
Observability for machine state, incidents, signal freshness, replay, and recovery review.
Retrofit Commissioning
Review existing robot cells through assessment, preview, operator review, and approval conversations.
Evidence And Review
How Xolver keeps operating context, review needs, and records understandable.
OEM Compatibility Packs
How Xolver assesses fit with existing robot families and partner equipment.
Scene Context
How observations and work-area context ground preview and pilot decisions.
Deployment Approach
1. Assess
Review the environment, machine, task, safety requirements, and success criteria.
2. Pilot
Start with preview or passive evaluation. Review what the system proposes and where it refuses.
3. Rollout
Expand only after operator review and site-specific requirements are understood.
4. Govern
Keep a reviewable record of what happened and what changed.
Public Documentation
Public Materials
- Product overview
- Application approach
- Physical AI operating concepts
Partner Materials
- Integration details
- Site-specific engagement notes
- Evaluation materials
World model: A way for the system to reason about what is happening now and what may happen next.
Safe refusal: A designed stop condition where the system pauses and escalates instead of forcing an unsafe action.
Safety check: A review boundary that decides whether a proposed action is allowed before movement.
Review record: The operating context that helps a team understand what was proposed, what changed, and what happened next.
Sentinel: Xolver's observability layer for monitoring physical AI systems, reviewing incidents, replaying context, and guiding recovery workflows.
Contact-rich task: Work where grip, touch, pressure, or part movement affects success.
Documentation Scope
Public materials
Product overview, application approach, review framing, and key operating concepts.
Private by design
Proprietary implementation detail, sensitive integration specifics, and partner-specific engagement material.
Partner materials
More detailed materials shared directly as customer needs become clear.
FAQ
How is this different from traditional automation?
Traditional automation is usually written for a known path. Xolver helps machines handle changing work while still staying inside reviewed operating boundaries.
Do you replace existing plant systems?
No. Xolver is designed to work alongside existing plant systems and controls rather than replacing equipment that already does its job.
What do public materials cover?
Our public materials cover products, operating concepts, application approach, and buyer evaluation paths. Deeper implementation detail is shared through partner engagement.
Is every deployment path identical?
No. Each engagement depends on the machine, task, site constraints, operating requirements, and review needs.
What happens on network loss?
Xolver is designed so important context can stay close to the machine. Site-specific behavior is discussed directly during engagement.
How do you prevent hallucinations?
The model is not treated as the final authority over action. Xolver's architecture separates proposal from execution so physical behavior can remain bounded by policy and constraints.
What data leaves the site?
Data handling is scoped per engagement. Xolver is designed to keep sensitive machine and site information controlled, with shared records limited to what the deployment requires.
How do pilots start?
We begin with a scoped application conversation to understand current operations and where reviewed machine intelligence could add value.